Learn why leading firms trust our attorney-led estate planning software–
View
Advisors

Why your clients want estate planning, but not from a traditional law firm

The need for estate planning is at an all-time high amid the Great Wealth Transfer, but clients want their financial advisor and attorney to work together to complete their plan.
Share this

Executive Summary

Clients are rejecting the fragmented estate planning experience that happens from a traditional law firm. Most still want attorney-drafted documents, legal compliance, and professional guidance, but they now expect that guidance to be delivered differently. Estate planning affects beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, insurance structures, business succession plans, and long-term wealth-transfer goals that already sit inside the advisor relationship. When clients are expected to navigate the estate planning process with multiple professionals they don’t know, have to repeat information, and manage the coordination of working with different professionals, the estate planning follow-through declines. The most effective estate planning experience combines legal expertise with continuity, context, and trust clients already have with their financial advisor.

Do clients want estate planning

Question Answer
Do clients believe estate planning is important? Yes. Most Americans say estate planning is important.
Do most Americans have an estate plan? No. Only 24% of Americans report having a will. That share has declined since 2022, not improved.
Are clients rejecting attorneys? No. Clients still want attorney-drafted documents and legal oversight.
Why do clients delay estate planning? Complexity, uncertainty, and fragmented workflows create friction.
What role do advisors play? Advisors often identify estate-planning needs and provide ongoing context.
What do clients increasingly expect? Coordinated, transparent, and integrated planning experiences.

Why estate planning demand is rising, but completion rates are not

Estate planning awareness has never been higher, as more Americans recognize the importance of protecting families, planning, and transferring wealth, and financial advisors are discussing estate planning more frequently. Although there is more awareness around estate planning, many clients still postpone creating or updating an estate plan because the process feels overwhelming or isn’t an immediate priority. 

According to Caring.com's 2025 Wills and Estate Planning Survey, most Americans still believe estate planning is important, yet only 24% report having a will — down from 33% in 2022. The trend is moving in the wrong direction, not staying flat. At the same time, Cerulli Associates projects that $124 trillion will transfer between generations through 2048, the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in U.S. history.

If the intent, assets, and needs for preparing for the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in U.S. history are already there, why are so many clients still postponing creating an estate plan? The problem is often the friction to create a plan.

Clients want protection, clarity, and control over what happens to their wealth. What they often resist is a process that feels disconnected from the rest of their financial lives.

Estate planning becomes easier to delay when it feels:

  • Separate from their broader financial strategy
  • Heavy on legal terminology and light on practical context
  • Unclear in cost, scope, or timeline
  • Disconnected from the advisor relationship they already trust

Why estate planning adoption remains low

There are several reasons why estate planning adoption continues to remain low. Estate planning can be perceived as only for the wealthy; the process may feel intimidating; clients don’t know where to start, especially when legal counsel is involved; it can include difficult or uncomfortable conversations; or assume having beneficiaries is enough. 

Estate planning requires people to think about incapacity, death, family dynamics, taxes, inheritances, business transitions, and difficult conversations that many would rather avoid. When the process also introduces new professionals, unfamiliar terminology, and unclear next steps, hesitation increases.

People are more likely to follow through on a complex decision when it's introduced by someone they already trust and framed as part of a plan they're already building, rather than as a freestanding task assigned by an unfamiliar professional. Although estate planning is one example of this, this principle remains true for most decisions that require making a decision for taboo subjects, like finances or family decisions. 

That dynamic cuts both ways, though. The Financial Planning Association's research on advisor-client communication found that planners often rate their own communication quality higher than clients do — a reminder that an existing relationship doesn't automatically transfer trust to a new, more sensitive topic. The advisor relationship is the right starting point for estate planning, but the trust still has to be deliberately extended into that conversation, not assumed.

So rather than trying to convince clients that estate planning matters, the real challenge is helping them move from intention to implement and complete an estate plan for their needs.

Estate planning often feels like a legal event. Clients want a planning process

Traditional law firms are designed around legal deliverables. Wills, trusts, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, fiduciary appointments, and tax provisions form the foundation of the engagement.

That legal foundation is essential, but clients rarely experience estate planning as a document problem.

They experience it as a family problem, a retirement problem, a succession problem, or a wealth-transfer problem.

They worry about whether a spouse will be financially secure, whether children will handle money responsibly, whether a family business can survive a transition, or whether taxes will reduce what they spent decades building.

The legal documents solve those concerns, but they are not how clients frame the decision. When the process begins with legal terminology instead of planning goals, estate planning can feel transactional. When it begins with strategy, clients more easily understand the purpose behind the documents.

Where the traditional estate planning experience fails

In many traditional models, the advisor identifies an estate-planning need, introduces an attorney, and then steps back while the legal process unfolds. The attorney may do excellent work and the advisor may remain involved, but the friction often appears in the handoff. 

From the client's perspective, the process can feel fragmented because they were recommended to work with an attorney they don’t know by a financial advisor they trust. The relationship that the client and advisor worked so hard for now is in the hands of an attorney. The client has to gather all the information they and the advisor worked hard to collect, translate their financial goals into questions the attorney has for the estate plan, understand what both professionals want, and then translate and coordinate information between the two professionals to make sure everyone on their separate agendas, systems, and workflows. 

The traditional estate planning fails because the process is exhausting, confusing, and details get lost in translation. Especially, when the client is anticipating everyone to work together on their behalf with their expertise to complete an estate plan made for them to begin with. 

That experience stands out because most other parts of their financial lives are integrated. Banking, investments, taxes, and healthcare increasingly operate through connected platforms, while estate planning often still depends on the client to coordinate communication and keep the process moving.

The issue is rarely the quality of the advice. More often, it is the experience of navigating between professionals and processes that were never designed to work together.

How do financial advisors use estate planning to build client

Advisors build trust using estate planning by helping clients identify important issues and coordinate solutions through asking questions about the client’s financial portfolio, identifying planning gaps, coordinating with the right professionals, and showing care by asking about family, legacy, and personal goals. 

Estate planning is deeply personal, and clients often discuss retirement concerns, family dynamics, charitable goals, long-term care planning, inheritance questions, and business succession with their advisors long before legal documents enter the conversation. Those discussions build context over years.

Introducing a new professional at the point where those conversations become more sensitive creates a second trust-building process at the same time complexity is increasing. That does not mean clients distrust attorneys. It means advisors occupy a position of continuity that clients already understand and rely upon, making it easier for many clients to move forward when estate planning begins within an existing relationship.

Estate planning touches the entire financial plan

Clients increasingly expect estate planning to feel integrated because it already intersects with nearly every major area of financial planning.

Estate planning directly affects:

  • Retirement account distributions
  • Beneficiary designations
  • Trust funding
  • Insurance ownership structures
  • Business succession planning
  • Charitable giving strategies
  • Liquidity planning
  • Tax planning

These issues sit at the intersection of legal planning and financial planning, which is exactly why clients expect them to be coordinated.

When estate planning and financial planning operate independently, inconsistencies emerge. Trusts may never be funded. Beneficiary designations may override the intended plan. Succession strategies may conflict with legal documents. Distribution plans may create unintended tax consequences.

When estate planning and financial planning operate independently, inconsistencies emerge. Trusts may never be funded. Beneficiary designations may override the intended plan. Succession strategies may conflict with legal documents. Distribution plans may create unintended tax consequences.

That's not a hypothetical risk. The IRS is explicit that a retirement account's beneficiary designation controls who inherits the account, regardless of what a will or trust says. A client can have a perfectly drafted estate plan and an outdated beneficiary form from a decade-old job change, and the form wins.

Clients assume these systems work together. When they discover they do not, confidence suffers.

Traditional delivery vs. integrated delivery

Element Traditional Law Firm Model Integrated Advisory Model
Entry Point Legal documents and compliance Financial goals and planning objectives
Relationship Context New professional relationship Existing advisor relationship
Information Flow Client coordinates information Structured collaboration among professionals
Process Visibility Document-centered milestones Ongoing planning experience
Strategic Alignment Legal compliance first Legal compliance integrated into strategy
Client Perception Separate legal engagement Continuation of planning relationship

This is not a critique of attorneys, but an observation about workflow design.

The legal work may be identical. The client experience often is not.

The National Association of Estate Planners & Councils — the field's own multidisciplinary professional body, representing attorneys, accountants, trust officers, and financial planners — describes the team approach as its core value, not a workaround: "the team concept of estate planning best serves the client." The integrated model isn't a deviation from how the profession defines good practice. It's closer to how the profession already says it should work.

Predictability and transparency matter in estate planning

Clients increasingly expect clear deliverables, defined timelines, and predictable processes.

Many legal engagements operate under hourly billing structures and variable scopes. That flexibility often makes sense because complexity varies significantly from client to client.

From the client's perspective, however, uncertainty can create hesitation. When expectations around cost, timing, and deliverables feel unclear, estate planning becomes easier to postpone.

For many clients, the barrier is not the value of estate planning itself, but the uncertainty around how the process works, what it costs, and how long it will take.

How digital expectations have changed in estate planning

Clients increasingly expect secure portals, digital document access, online collaboration, and visibility across the professionals helping manage their financial lives.

Financial services, healthcare, banking, and tax preparation have largely adapted to those expectations. Estate planning has modernized more slowly.

A physical binder signals that the work is finished. A connected planning platform suggests the plan remains active, accessible, and easier to revisit as circumstances change. That distinction may seem subtle, but it shapes how clients perceive the planning process and their role in maintaining it.

Clients are not rejecting attorneys for estate planning

Clients still want licensed attorneys, legally enforceable documents, and state-specific legal expertise. What many increasingly reject is a delivery model that requires them to coordinate the entire process themselves.

The shift is not pushing out legal services, but finding a way to combine legal expertise delivered within a more coordinated planning experience.

Key takeaways

  • Estate planning demand remains high, but completion rates remain low.
  • Clients often delay estate planning because of friction, not lack of interest.
  • Advisors frequently identify estate-planning needs before attorneys become involved.
  • Estate planning affects beneficiary designations, retirement assets, insurance structures, succession plans, and tax strategies.
  • Clients increasingly expect integrated, digitally connected planning experiences.
  • Most clients still want attorney-drafted documents and legal oversight.
  • The preference shift is toward coordination, not away from attorneys.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do clients delay estate planning?

Many clients delay estate planning because the process feels complex, fragmented, or disconnected from the rest of their financial lives.

Do clients prefer advisors or attorneys for estate planning?

Most clients want both. Advisors often provide strategic context while attorneys provide legal drafting and compliance.

Can a financial advisor provide estate planning?

Financial advisors can help identify planning needs and coordinate implementation, but legal documents generally must be prepared by licensed attorneys.

Why do estate plans fail to get implemented?

Many plans fail because beneficiary designations, account registrations, trust funding, and financial accounts are never fully aligned with the legal documents.

What is integrated estate planning?

Integrated estate planning combines legal drafting, financial planning, implementation, and ongoing coordination within a unified planning process.

Are clients rejecting traditional law firms?

Generally no. Clients still value legal expertise. What many reject is a disconnected process that requires them to manage coordination themselves.

How Estate Guru’s attorney-led platform removes friction for advisors and their clients

Estate Guru offers attorney-led estate planning within the advisory process, improving coordination and follow-through while preserving the legal integrity clients expect.

Clients still value legal rigor, compliance, and documents that hold up under scrutiny. What has changed is their expectation that estate planning should feel connected to the rest of their financial lives.

They increasingly expect the same level of coordination, visibility, and continuity they experience elsewhere in financial planning. The preference shift is not away from legal expertise. It is toward a process that brings legal expertise into an existing planning relationship rather than forcing clients to navigate separate systems and workflows on their own.

Our platform is attorney-led, which means we bring the attorney to you. Keep in mind: We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice–that’s what our in-network attorneys are for. While we work to make sure our information services are accurate, they’re meant as resources. Our materials and services don’t substitute for the advice of an attorney.

Table of Contents

More from the team